Wow, this article was quite interesting. Never before have I
heard of miniature guide horses and better yet, service parrots! I agree with
Brea; Rebecca Skloot never gave us a definite solution on what species of
animals can be qualified as service animals. I believe that if the animal,
exotic or not, should have the chance to help their owner. We should all be
about helping each other. I actually find it ridiculous that there is a line
between a pet that does “tasks” and “work” and one that provides “comfort”. The
task of the pet is to provide the comfort to the owner. We should definitely
also consider how the owner, with the disability, feels. For a second, try to
step inside the shoes of them. Think about how you would feel with a disability
and not being able to bring your pet that keeps you calm and helps you, along
with you. I understand that there are health problems and that the public
places are worried. But can’t we just get these animals checked up? Prior to
certifying them as service animals, just check their health and make sure
there’s nothing terribly wrong with them. And as for the other people, it’s not
like the service animals are doing any harm to them. They’re simply helping
their owner; pretty sure they just catch people’s eyes. On page 9, third
paragraph; Skloot quotes, “…If they need a wheelchair, a dog, a miniature horse
or any other device or animal, society has to accept that, because those things
are, in fact, part of that person.” I strongly believe in this. I think, we as
society, have to just accept that there are such animals that are used as
service animals. Those certain animals have become part of the owner. And
honestly, I’d rather have a parrot around to calm Jim Eggers down than have him
blow up and have his “homicidal thoughts.”

No comments:
Post a Comment